Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology & Hydrogeology   Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology & Hydrogeology; February 2003; v. 36; no. 1; p. 85-96; DOI: 10.1144/1470-923602-007
© 2003 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cassar, J.
Right arrow Articles by Vella, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

MCB numbered Original Article

Methodology to identify badly weathering limestone using geochemistry: case study on the Lower Globigerina Limestone of the Maltese islands

JoAnn Cassar1 and Alfred J. Vella2

1 1Institute for Masonry and Construction Research, University of Malta, Msida MSD 06, Malta(e-mail: joann.cassar@um.edu.mt)
2 2Department of Chemistry, University of Malta, Msida MSD 06, Malta (e-mail: alfred.j.vella@um.edu.mt)

This paper proposes a new objective method to classify building limestone into types of varying durability working on samples that are visually identical in appearance. Geochemical data were obtained for 90 samples of the Lower Globigerina Limestone of the Maltese islands. Multivariate analyses, including cluster analysis, principal components analysis and discriminant analysis allowed the identification of variables SiO2, Al2O3, K2O, TiO2, Fe2O3 as indicators to distinguish between more durable ‘franka’ limestone and the less durable facies locally called ‘soll’. This hypothesis was confirmed by differences in geochemical data from samples of both weathered and unweathered stone taken from abandoned quarry faces. In the less durable ‘soll’, SiO2 concentrations are >3.4±0.3%, Al2O3 >0.78±0.05%, K2O >0.13±0.01%, TiO2 >0.06±0.002% and Fe2O3 >0.47±0.02%. However, some overlap occurs between the two stone types for all five components, demarcating another stone type we designated as ‘intermediate’. The geochemical differences are reflected in mineralogical data and in acid-insoluble residues. This geochemical method is simple and innovative. It can be used to identify newly extracted limestone for use in building and also for replacement of deteriorated stones in old buildings.

Key Words: durability • geochemistry • laboratory studies • limestone • weathering




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
E. Rothert, T. Eggers, J. Cassar, J. Ruedrich, B. Fitzner, and S. Siegesmund
Stone properties and weathering induced by salt crystallization of Maltese Globigerina Limestone
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2007; 271(1): 189 - 198.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London