Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology & Hydrogeology   Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology & Hydrogeology; May 2004; v. 37; no. 2; p. 113-130; DOI: 10.1144/1470-9236/03-029
© 2004 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heathcote, J.A.
Right arrow Articles by Soley, R.W.N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Original Article

Rainfall routing to runoff and recharge for regional groundwater resource models

J.A. Heathcote, R.T. Lewis and R.W.N. Soley

Entec UK Ltd, 160–162 Abbey Foregate, Shrewsbury SY2 6BZ, UK (e-mail: soler@entecuk.co.uk)

The EU Water Framework Directive dictates an integrated approach to surface water and groundwater resource assessment and management. The adequacy of existing groundwater models and surface process models for resource management purposes is reviewed, and is found wanting in areas where both surface water and groundwater flow processes are important. Thus there is a need for appropriate modelling tools to simulate near-surface processes and interface with groundwater models. The basic processes operating between precipitation and groundwater recharge are discussed, with particular consideration of rapid runoff, interflow and ‘runoff recharge’, which can result in delay and translocation of recharge. These processes are translated into an algorithmic scheme defined by only a small number of parameters, based on ideas current in the literature. The resulting scheme is sufficiently flexible to model both outcrop aquifers and those where rapid runoff, interflow and runoff recharge are also important. Calculations can be carried out for simple lumped catchments or on model grids so that the tool can be applied throughout model development as understanding improves, from initial lumped water balances to the generation of distributed stream flow and recharge input files for the MODFLOW groundwater flow code. An important consequence of this approach is that modelled river flows can be compared directly with gauged flows without the need for baseflow separation. The success of the algorithmic scheme is demonstrated by two examples: reproducing the results of an existing model of a limestone aquifer with perforated cover (where runoff recharge is particularly important); and by constructing a new model of a sandstone aquifer with complex top boundary conditions.

Key Words: aquifers • hydrology • models • rivers and streams • water resources




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and HydrogeologyHome page
M.G. Shepley and M. Streetly
The estimation of 'natural' summer outflows from the Permo-Triassic Sandstone aquifer, UK
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, August 1, 2007; 40(3): 213 - 227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London