Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology & Hydrogeology   Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology & Hydrogeology; November 2005; v. 38; no. 4; p. 325-336; DOI: 10.1144/1470-9236/04-067
© 2005 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rushton, K.R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Original Article

Impact of aquitard storage on leaky aquifer pumping test analysis

K.R. Rushton

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK

Estimates of the effective vertical hydraulic conductivity of low permeability strata (aquitards) which overlie an aquifer are required when assessing groundwater resources. One approach to estimation is to conduct pumping tests and analyse the drawdowns using classical leaky aquifer theory. However, unreliable parameter values may be deduced since aquitard storage is ignored in classical leaky aquifer pumping test analysis. Analytical solutions which take account of aquitard storage are available, but there are few published examples of their successful application in practical situations. As an alternative, a numerical model based on the same mathematical formulation as the analytical solutions is developed. The numerical model is used to illustrate the flow processes within the aquifer–aquitard system; an important finding is that vertical velocities at the base of an aquitard initially increase rapidly and subsequently decrease to final steady state values. A field pumping test is analysed in detail. Errors in parameter values, which are likely to occur when aquitard storage is ignored, are illustrated.

Key Words: hydraulic conductivity • numerical models • piezometers • pump tests • storage coefficient







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London