Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology & Hydrogeology   Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology & Hydrogeology; May 2006; v. 39; no. 2; p. 197-207; DOI: 10.1144/1470-9236/04-076
© 2006 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rosier, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The effect of broadleaved woodland on Chalk groundwater resources

J. Roberts1 and P. Rosier

1 1CEH-Wallingford, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, UK (e-mail: jro@ceh.ac.uk)

The impact of broadleaved woodland on chalk groundwater resources, in Hampshire, UK, was assessed with a comparative study of beech woodland at Black Wood near Micheldever and grass at Bridgets Farm near Winchester. At both sites, parallel estimates of evaporation and detailed studies of the changes in soil water content and the direction of water movement were made.

Beneath both sites, a reduction in soil water content was observed during the summer to a depth of 6 m. However, total water potential measurements showed that upward movement of water was only occurring in the upper 2 m of the profile, whilst drainage was occurring below this point. Drainage continued even when soil moisture deficits existed in the upper part of the profile. Seasonal differences between woodland and grass do exist, however annual differences in evaporation and drainage are insignificant.

The similarity of evaporation from and drainage below the broadleaved woodland and grass sites contrasts markedly with several other studies that show greater drying below woodland. Unlike other comparisons, this study was made within a large block of woodland and both sites were on chalk. The relevance of woodland size and chalk substrate are discussed.

Key Words: Chalk • groundwater • recharge • woodland







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London